|
Opening and Decision Challenge Assessment
(20 minutes)
|
Complex decision sharing: pairs share their most challenging workplace decisions, identify what made them difficult using discussion prompts like "What information was missing?" and "What made it complex?", categorise types of complexity, write themes on paper, 8 minutes sharing
Decision-making process reflection: individuals map their typical approach to complex decisions on paper, identify where they get stuck or need support using simple flow chart format, share common bottlenecks, 6 minutes reflection
AI potential demonstration: facilitator demonstrates AI assistance with sample complex decision scenario on screen, learners observe how AI can support different phases of decision-making, 6 minutes demonstration
|
Healthcare: Treatment protocol decisions requiring integration of patient factors, medical evidence, resource constraints, and regulatory requirements
Legal: Case strategy decisions requiring analysis of legal precedents, client objectives, risk factors, and procedural considerations
Education: Curriculum decisions requiring consideration of learning objectives, student needs, resource availability, and educational standards
|
Decision complexity identification: pairs categorise different types of decision-making challenges they face
Process bottleneck assessment: learners identify specific points where their decision-making process slows down
|
|
Problem Definition and Framing Techniques
(30 minutes)
|
Problem framing workshop: facilitator provides complex workplace scenarios verbally, teams practice reframing problems from different perspectives using questions like "What if we looked at this differently?", write alternative framings on paper, 12 minutes framing
Stakeholder analysis exercise: learners use AI conceptually to help identify all parties affected by decisions, map stakeholder interests and concerns through discussion, prioritise stakeholder impact, 10 minutes analysis
Root question identification: individuals practice using AI assistance conceptually to help identify the real question behind complex scenarios, distinguish symptoms from causes through discussion, 8 minutes identification
|
Financial Services: Investment strategy decisions requiring consideration of client risk profiles, market conditions, regulatory requirements, and portfolio balance
Manufacturing: Process improvement decisions requiring analysis of safety requirements, cost implications, quality standards, and operational impact
Public Sector: Policy implementation decisions requiring consideration of citizen impact, budget constraints, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder interests
|
Problem framing assessment: teams demonstrate ability to view challenges from multiple perspectives
Stakeholder identification check: learners show comprehensive understanding of decision impacts on different parties
|
|
Information Gathering and Analysis Framework
(35 minutes)
|
Information mapping exercise: learners use AI conceptually to help identify what information is needed for specific decisions, categorise information by importance and availability through discussion, create systematic gathering plans on paper, 15 minutes mapping
Source evaluation practice: facilitator provides various information sources verbally, teams practice assessing credibility, relevance, and reliability using AI assistance conceptually, develop evaluation criteria, 12 minutes evaluation
Gap analysis workshop: individuals identify information gaps in provided decision scenarios through discussion, use AI conceptually to help develop strategies for addressing missing information, 8 minutes analysis
|
Technology: Product development decisions requiring market research, technical feasibility analysis, competitive assessment, and resource planning
Consulting: Strategic recommendations requiring client industry analysis, competitive benchmarking, operational assessment, and implementation planning
Retail: Market expansion decisions requiring location analysis, customer research, competitive landscape assessment, and financial projections
|
Information planning assessment: learners demonstrate systematic approaches to gathering decision-relevant information
Source credibility evaluation: teams show ability to assess information quality and reliability
|
|
Option Generation and Evaluation
(30 minutes)
|
Creative option development: teams use AI assistance conceptually to help generate multiple solutions for complex scenarios, practice divergent thinking techniques using "what if" scenarios, ensure creative option exploration, 15 minutes development
Evaluation matrix creation: individuals create systematic evaluation frameworks using AI assistance conceptually, test frameworks with sample decisions through discussion, refine approaches, 10 minutes creation
Trade-off analysis practice: learners practice identifying and weighing competing factors in decision scenarios using AI support conceptually, develop balanced consideration approaches through discussion, 5 minutes practice
|
Healthcare: Treatment option evaluation requiring consideration of clinical effectiveness, patient preferences, resource utilisation, and outcome probabilities
Legal: Case resolution strategies requiring evaluation of settlement options, litigation risks, client objectives, and resource requirements
Consulting: Strategic recommendation development requiring generation of multiple strategic options with different risk-reward profiles
|
Option generation exercise: learners demonstrate ability to generate diverse, creative solution alternatives
Evaluation framework practice: learners create systematic approaches for comparing decision alternatives
|
|
Risk Assessment and Scenario Planning
(30 minutes)
|
Risk identification and analysis: pairs use AI conceptually to help identify potential risks for complex decisions, categorise risks by type and impact on paper, develop mitigation strategies using brainstorming, 12 minutes analysis
Scenario development exercise: learners create multiple future scenarios using AI assistance conceptually, analyse how decisions might perform under different conditions through discussion, 10 minutes development
Contingency planning workshop: teams develop backup plans and decision trigger points using AI support conceptually, create adaptive decision frameworks on paper, 8 minutes planning
|
Healthcare: Treatment implementation requiring identification of clinical risks, operational constraints, and patient safety considerations
Legal: Litigation strategy requiring scenario planning for different case outcomes, procedural developments, and settlement possibilities
Education: Programme implementation requiring contingency plans for resource changes, student response variations, and external factors
|
Risk analysis assessment: pairs demonstrate systematic identification and categorisation of decision risks
Scenario planning practice: learners develop realistic future scenarios and analyse decision implications
|
|
Analytical Thinking Enhancement
(25 minutes)
|
Bias identification and mitigation: learners use AI conceptually to help identify potential cognitive biases in decision-making, develop bias-checking protocols on paper, 10 minutes identification
Evidence evaluation framework: individuals practice using AI conceptually to help assess evidence quality, identify gaps in information, develop evidence-gathering strategies on paper, 8 minutes framework
Logic checking and validation: teams use AI conceptually to help test the logical consistency of their reasoning, identify assumptions, validate argument structures through discussion, 7 minutes validation
|
Financial Services: Investment analysis requiring recognition of confirmation bias, anchoring effects, and market sentiment influences
Manufacturing: Quality improvement decisions requiring evaluation of production data, supplier information, and market research evidence
Public Sector: Budget allocation decisions requiring logical analysis of competing priorities, resource constraints, and outcome projections
|
Bias recognition practice: learners identify specific biases that might affect their professional decision-making
Logic validation practice: teams demonstrate systematic checking of reasoning quality and consistency
|
|
Strategic Decision Integration
(25 minutes)
|
Multi-factor decision synthesis: learners practice integrating complex analysis into clear decision recommendations using AI assistance conceptually, balance competing factors on paper, 12 minutes synthesis
Communication and justification: individuals practice explaining complex decisions to different audiences using AI support conceptually, develop persuasive rationales through role-play, 8 minutes communication
Implementation planning integration: teams connect decision-making to action planning using AI assistance conceptually, develop execution strategies and monitoring approaches on paper, 5 minutes integration
|
Technology: Architecture decisions requiring synthesis of technical requirements, business objectives, resource constraints, and strategic implications
Consulting: Client recommendation presentation requiring clear communication of analysis, rationale, and implementation approaches to stakeholders
Retail: Strategic initiative decisions requiring connection of analysis to implementation planning, resource allocation, and success measurement
|
Decision synthesis assessment: learners demonstrate ability to integrate complex analysis into clear recommendations
Communication practice exercise: learners explain complex decisions clearly to different professional audiences
|
|
Professional Excellence and Continuous Improvement
(15 minutes)
|
Decision quality assessment: individuals develop frameworks for evaluating the quality of their decisions over time using AI assistance conceptually, 6 minutes development
Strategic thinking commitment: learners commit to one complex decision they will tackle using AI-assisted frameworks within two weeks verbally, define success metrics, 5 minutes commitment
Advanced technique preview: facilitator demonstrates expert-level strategic thinking with AI to build excitement for continued development, shows integration possibilities, 4 minutes preview
|
Healthcare: Clinical decision evaluation requiring systematic assessment of decision outcomes, learning opportunities, and process improvements
Legal: Strategic case management requiring application of systematic decision frameworks to complex legal scenarios
Education: Institutional strategic planning requiring sophisticated analysis and decision-making for educational excellence and organisational success
|
Quality assessment framework practice: learners create approaches for ongoing decision-making improvement
Excellence commitment validation: learners specify challenging strategic decisions they will address systematically
|